Heritage

The True Story Behind Princess Margaret's Scandalous Birthday Portrait

After Princess Margaret met Antony Armstrong-Jones, the man who would become her husband, the royal family's portraits became racier.
IMAGE WIKIMEDIA COMMONS
Comments

Once the members of the royal family take a liking to a brand or a product, they stamp their claims on it through royal patents.

The same can be said for people they like working with. These days, the Queen usually works with photographer Annie Leibowitz. During the earlier years of her reign, however, a common fixture at photo shoots was society photographer Cecil Beaton. Primarily a fashion photographer for Vanity Fair and Vogue, he was able to establish a close connection to the British royal family. He photographed the Duke of Windsor and Wallis Simpson’s wedding in 1937 and later documented the Queen’s coronation in 1953.

When the Queen and the royal family needed a new image after the abdication crisis, Beaton’s photography provided just that. The award-winning set designer and photographer was trusted by Hollywood stars such as Audrey Hepburn and Elizabeth Taylor.

The Palace commissioned Beaton for birthday portraits and family photos. His flamboyant style provided the royals with a whimsical grandeur they desired to amplify their image.

When a collection of Beaton’s portraits were exhibited in celebration of Queen Elizabeth’s jubilee, its curator Susanna Brown said of Beaton’s work, “They were PR, not family portraits.” He took a number of these "PR" portraits for Princess Margaret’s birthday.

But Beaton's work for the royal family was threatened when another eminent photographer entered their lives. Marriage, as we know, is a strong bond in every family, and when Princess Margaret married Antony Armstrong-Jones, later commonly known as Lord Snowdon, in 1960, it wasn't too long before Beaton took other jobs. Still, Beaton went on to take the royals' photos until the late ‘60s, since most of the photos that Armstrong-Jones took during that time were not as official as the portraits released in PR fashion.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

There was an overlap in the years Armstrong-Jones and Beaton took photos of the royals. It’s a little-known fact that Armstrong-Jones took several earlier photos of the Queen and her growing family—he shot a photo of the brood in 1957 when the family of four had not yet welcomed Princes Andrew and Edward—way before he had even met Princess Margaret.

It was only in 1958 that the couple did meet through lady-in-waiting Elizabeth Cavendish. A month or more later, Armstrong-Jones asked Margaret to come to his studio for a portrait. He asked her for a change in wardrobe and pose and she immediately took to him, reports Vanity Fair. She eventually requested that he shoot her official portrait for her 29th birthday. See the actual portrait below:

Although they began to see each other more frequently, nobody ever paid attention to the photographer, and members of the press were later shocked to find out that the Princess planned to wed someone of such stature.

Beaton and Armstrong-Jones possessed strikingly different photography styles. The latter was a lot more risqué. Seven years after they were married, Snowdon snapped a revealing portrait of the princess similar to the birthday portrait he took of her in 1959, in which she appeared to be wearing only jewelry.  He later took a similar shot of his own daughter, Lady Sarah Armstrong-Jones for her 21st birthday.

Even after the dissolution of his and Margaret’s marriage, Armstrong-Jones continued to take portraits of the royal family, dispelling the idea that the couple’s divorce was a messy one. He even took some memorable ones of Prince Charles and Diana. One of his most notable later works was a portrait of the Queen in 2010. Snowdon outlived Princess Margaret and passed away in January 2017.

Comments
About The Author
Hannah Lazatin
Senior Staff Writer
Hannah is a communications graduate from Ateneo de Manila University. She’s originally from Pampanga and from a big, close-knit family who likes to find a reason to get together at the dinner table. Experiences inspire her. “Once, at a restaurant, I received an interpretation of my second name ‘Celina,’ and it meant 'someone who tries everything once' and that is me through and through,” she says. As for the job, she wants her “readers to be inspired by the stories of the people we feature and to move them to reach for greater things.”
View Other Articles From Hannah
Comments
Latest Stories
 
Share
She appears to be judging all those royal walkabouts.
 
Share
This isn't the model's first time working with the iconic brand.
 
Share
An official announcement is expected to come this week.
 
Share
 
Share
Ditch the cheap plastic pumpkins in favor of black candelabras, gilded skulls, and gothic chandeliers.
 
Share
There is now the court of public opinion, a dour, unwinnable arena you never want to find yourself in.
 
Share
The determined chef is on a quest to make American delicacies that will impress even the snobbiest Italian connoisseur.
 
Share
Here's everything you need to know about the 2019 Trooping the Colour.
 
Share
It turns out women want the same sort of rare and expensive watches that have historically been sold to men.
 
Share
Here's how she fell for the talent agent in less than a year.
Load More Articles
CONNECT WITH US