Heritage

Prince Charles Apparently Didn't Tell Diana the Full Story About Camilla Parker Bowles

A new book claims the prince “was the architect of the disaster” between himself and Diana.
IMAGE GETTY
Comments

Princess Diana once said Camilla Parker Bowles was the “third person” in her marriage to Prince Charles. But according to The Duchess: The Untold Story, a new book by Penny Junor, their union may have been doomed from the start. In an excerpt of the book published by the Daily Mail, close friends say the couple was always incompatible, and it was Charles’ omission of the real details about his relationship with Camilla that got things off to a rocky start.


The book claims at least three of Charles’s friends raised concerns about his relationship with Diana, and all of them simply got yelled at for doing so. One friend, Nicholas Soames, thought they didn’t have much in common and that there was an “intellectual gap” between then. Other friends, Norton and Penny Romsey, thought Diana didn’t love Charles as a person, but more as a “concept” of royalty. They also claimed she was too driven to win his affections—and the position in the family. Later on, in 1993, Diana’s grandmother, Lady Fermoy, apologized to the Queen and to Prince Charles for not warning them about Diana being a “dishonest and difficult girl.”

But one person who approved of the relationship was Camilla Parker Bowles, and though her physical relationship with Charles had ended for the time, they were still very close. Camilla thought Diana was “very sweet and funny” and interacted well with children. Their relationship went well at first, but that was when Charles was simply portraying Camilla as an old friend, not an old girlfriend.

ADVERTISEMENT - CONTINUE READING BELOW

Once she figured out the truth, she grew jealous, and their relationship deteriorated even before their wedding day. She even questioned marrying him in general once she found out he was giving her a bracelet as a gift, but it was too late.

"He made a huge mistake. You can sympathize with Diana—oh God, yes," a close friend of Charles told Junor. "Put that way, he was the architect of the disaster... also he wouldn't have had the sensitivity. He's very interested in objective things, but not subjective, so he couldn't have understood the complexities of her feelings."

From: Harper's BAZAAR

Comments
About The Author
Megan Friedman
View Other Articles From Megan Friedman
Comments
Latest Stories
 
Share
"His legacy will live on for many more generations after us."
 
Share
A leading Italian mixologist makes the argument for liqueurs in fine dining.
 
Share
Suddenly everyone you know is heading to New Zealand. Here's why people are planning their move today.
 
Share
These romantic retreats have everything you need-except children.
 
Share
Remembering a pioneering entrepreneur and philanthropist in his own words.
 
Share
Family sources close to the chairman emeritus of SM Investment confirmed his passing the morning of January 19.
 
Share
These fresh travel options will open up doors to new sights and sounds without the hassle of a layover.
 
Share
What good is the freedom that money offers if you don’t know how to relax?
 
Share
Is this billion dollar listing a stunt or the future site of a spectacular mansion?
Load More Articles
CONNECT WITH US