How Lord Altrincham Changed the Monarchy Forever
How do you keep a stodgy, centuries-old institution like the British monarchy relevant? In 2017, perhaps the answer lies in Meghan Markle, Prince Harry's new fiancé. But 60 years ago, the royal family did some soul searching following very public dressing down by a prominent writer, the second Baron Altrincham.
Lord Altrincham (who was later known as John Grigg after he disclaimed his title in 1963) shook Britain when he suggested that the Queen and the courtiers who supported here were out of touch with her subjects.
Altrincham make his arguments in 1957, publishing his thoughts on Queen Elizabeth in his magazine, the National and English Review. He argued that she and her courtiers were too upper-class and removed from the common English citizen, and he criticized the Queen personally, calling her style of speaking "a pain in the neck" and saying she came off as "a priggish school girl."
It wasn't the first time Altrincham had shared his criticisms of the monarchy. "What is funny is that these criticisms is that he first made them in 1953. He aired these ideas at the time of the coronation, and nobody paid any attention, because that wasn’t the mood," said Robert Lacey.
But by 1957, the national mood had shifted.
"It changed radically, partly because the shine of the new Queen had worn off, perhaps, but also because Britain had been through this trauma of the Suez Crisis, an arrogant military adventure overseas that ended in disaster, and caused a great deal of soul searching in Britain. Suddenly his ideas struck a chord."
But it wasn't just the nation's mood which had changed. There was a technological evolution as well.
In 1957, "Britain had just gotten its first independent television network. The BBC would not go near Lord Altrincham. They gave him no air time. But this new commercial network, gave him airtime."
It spread his perspective, and even earned him a slap in the face by a member of the League of Empire Loyalists, a group that argued that Britain should retain its empire. But despite the outcry he inspired, Altrincham wasn't a republican. He said he made his suggestions publicly to try and help the monarchy.
"The thing to say about Lord Altrincham was that he was a great monarchist. He wasn’t a republican when he criticized the queen. He was criticizing the fact that the queen and the old-fashioned courtiers were not serving the monarchy well in their style," said Lacey.
Eventually, the monarchy did adapt most of Altrincham's suggestions. For example, the queen's Christmas address was televised for the very first time in 1957, and by 1958, debutantes were no longer presented to the Queen in court.
"[The story of Altrincham] fit in with the larger zeitgeist, and I think that’s the appeal of the series, and the book. It sets the monarchy in the historical context. In season two, we’ll be moving into uncharted territory: the national psyche. The changes that happened in our society, affluence, the consumer society, the way the world changes," Lacey said.
"Altrincham is an example of the monarchy falling behind. Because ultimately, the monarchy is only as good as the people doing the job. We’re very proud in Britain of our system, in distinguishing between the 'executive' that's the politicians and the dignified, that’s the queen. But sometimes as we see with Lord Altrincham, that gets out of step."
This story originally appeared on Townandcountrymag.com.
* Minor edits have been made by the Townandcountry.ph editors.